Appearance
Priority B Rules: Strongly Recommended
These rules have been found to improve readability and/or developer experience in most projects. Your code will still run if you violate them, but violations should be rare and well-justified.
Component files
Whenever a build system is available to concatenate files, each component should be in its own file.
This helps you to more quickly find a component when you need to edit it or review how to use it.
Bad
javascript
app.component('TodoList', {
// ...
})
app.component('TodoItem', {
// ...
})
Good
components/
|- TodoList.js
|- TodoItem.js
components/
|- TodoList.vue
|- TodoItem.vue
Single-file component filename casing
Filenames of Single-File Components should either be always PascalCase or always kebab-case.
PascalCase works best with autocompletion in code editors, as it's consistent with how we reference components in JS(X) and templates, wherever possible. However, mixed case filenames can sometimes create issues on case-insensitive file systems, which is why kebab-case is also perfectly acceptable.
Bad
components/
|- mycomponent.vue
components/
|- myComponent.vue
Good
components/
|- MyComponent.vue
components/
|- my-component.vue
Base component names
Base components (a.k.a. presentational, dumb, or pure components) that apply app-specific styling and conventions should all begin with a specific prefix, such as Base
, App
, or V
.
Detailed Explanation
These components lay the foundation for consistent styling and behavior in your application. They may only contain:
- HTML elements,
- other base components, and
- 3rd-party UI components.
But they'll never contain global state (e.g. from a Pinia store).
Their names often include the name of an element they wrap (e.g. BaseButton
, BaseTable
), unless no element exists for their specific purpose (e.g. BaseIcon
). If you build similar components for a more specific context, they will almost always consume these components (e.g. BaseButton
may be used in ButtonSubmit
).
Some advantages of this convention:
When organized alphabetically in editors, your app's base components are all listed together, making them easier to identify.
Since component names should always be multi-word, this convention prevents you from having to choose an arbitrary prefix for simple component wrappers (e.g.
MyButton
,VueButton
).Since these components are so frequently used, you may want to simply make them global instead of importing them everywhere. A prefix makes this possible with Webpack:
javascript
const requireComponent = require.context(
'./src',
true,
/Base[A-Z]\w+\.(vue|js)$/
)
requireComponent.keys().forEach(function (fileName) {
let baseComponentConfig = requireComponent(fileName)
baseComponentConfig =
baseComponentConfig.default || baseComponentConfig
const baseComponentName =
baseComponentConfig.name ||
fileName.replace(/^.+\//, '').replace(/\.\w+$/, '')
app.component(baseComponentName, baseComponentConfig)
})
Bad
components/
|- MyButton.vue
|- VueTable.vue
|- Icon.vue
Good
components/
|- BaseButton.vue
|- BaseTable.vue
|- BaseIcon.vue
components/
|- AppButton.vue
|- AppTable.vue
|- AppIcon.vue
components/
|- VButton.vue
|- VTable.vue
|- VIcon.vue
Single-instance component names
Components that should only ever have a single active instance should begin with the The
prefix, to denote that there can be only one.
This does not mean the component is only used in a single page, but it will only be used once per page. These components never accept any props, since they are specific to your app, not their context within your app. If you find the need to add props, it's a good indication that this is actually a reusable component that is only used once per page for now.
Bad
components/
|- Heading.vue
|- MySidebar.vue
Good
components/
|- TheHeading.vue
|- TheSidebar.vue
Tightly coupled component names
Child components that are tightly coupled with their parent should include the parent component name as a prefix.
If a component only makes sense in the context of a single parent component, that relationship should be evident in its name. Since editors typically organize files alphabetically, this also keeps these related files next to each other.
Detailed Explanation
You might be tempted to solve this problem by nesting child components in directories named after their parent. For example:
components/
|- TodoList/
|- Item/
|- index.vue
|- Button.vue
|- index.vue
or:
components/
|- TodoList/
|- Item/
|- Button.vue
|- Item.vue
|- TodoList.vue
This isn't recommended, as it results in:
- Many files with similar names, making rapid file switching in code editors more difficult.
- Many nested sub-directories, which increases the time it takes to browse components in an editor's sidebar.
Bad
components/
|- TodoList.vue
|- TodoItem.vue
|- TodoButton.vue
components/
|- SearchSidebar.vue
|- NavigationForSearchSidebar.vue
Good
components/
|- TodoList.vue
|- TodoListItem.vue
|- TodoListItemButton.vue
components/
|- SearchSidebar.vue
|- SearchSidebarNavigation.vue
Order of words in component names
Component names should start with the highest-level (often most general) words and end with descriptive modifying words.
Detailed Explanation
You may be wondering:
"Why would we force component names to use less natural language?"
In natural English, adjectives and other descriptors do typically appear before the nouns, while exceptions require connector words. For example:
- Coffee with milk
- Soup of the day
- Visitor to the museum
You can definitely include these connector words in component names if you'd like, but the order is still important.
Also note that what's considered "highest-level" will be contextual to your app. For example, imagine an app with a search form. It may include components like this one:
components/
|- ClearSearchButton.vue
|- ExcludeFromSearchInput.vue
|- LaunchOnStartupCheckbox.vue
|- RunSearchButton.vue
|- SearchInput.vue
|- TermsCheckbox.vue
As you might notice, it's quite difficult to see which components are specific to the search. Now let's rename the components according to the rule:
components/
|- SearchButtonClear.vue
|- SearchButtonRun.vue
|- SearchInputExcludeGlob.vue
|- SearchInputQuery.vue
|- SettingsCheckboxLaunchOnStartup.vue
|- SettingsCheckboxTerms.vue
Since editors typically organize files alphabetically, all the important relationships between components are now evident at a glance.
You might be tempted to solve this problem differently, nesting all the search components under a "search" directory, then all the settings components under a "settings" directory. We only recommend considering this approach in very large apps (e.g. 100+ components), for these reasons:
- It generally takes more time to navigate through nested sub-directories, than scrolling through a single
components
directory. - Name conflicts (e.g. multiple
ButtonDelete.vue
components) make it more difficult to quickly navigate to a specific component in a code editor. - Refactoring becomes more difficult, because find-and-replace often isn't sufficient to update relative references to a moved component.
Bad
components/
|- ClearSearchButton.vue
|- ExcludeFromSearchInput.vue
|- LaunchOnStartupCheckbox.vue
|- RunSearchButton.vue
|- SearchInput.vue
|- TermsCheckbox.vue
Good
components/
|- SearchButtonClear.vue
|- SearchButtonRun.vue
|- SearchInputQuery.vue
|- SearchInputExcludeGlob.vue
|- SettingsCheckboxTerms.vue
|- SettingsCheckboxLaunchOnStartup.vue
Self-closing components
Components with no content should be self-closing in Single-File Components, string templates, and JSX - but never in DOM templates.
Components that self-close communicate that they not only have no content, but are meant to have no content. It's the difference between a blank page in a book and one labeled "This page intentionally left blank." Your code is also cleaner without the unnecessary closing tag.
Unfortunately, HTML doesn't allow custom elements to be self-closing - only official "void" elements. That's why the strategy is only possible when Vue's template compiler can reach the template before the DOM, then serve the DOM spec-compliant HTML.
Bad
vue
<!-- In Single-File Components, string templates, and JSX -->
<MyComponent></MyComponent>
vue
<!-- In DOM templates -->
<my-component/>
Good
vue
<!-- In Single-File Components, string templates, and JSX -->
<MyComponent/>
vue
<!-- In DOM templates -->
<my-component></my-component>
Component name casing in templates
In most projects, component names should always be PascalCase in Single-File Components and string templates - but kebab-case in DOM templates.
PascalCase has a few advantages over kebab-case:
- Editors can autocomplete component names in templates, because PascalCase is also used in JavaScript.
<MyComponent>
is more visually distinct from a single-word HTML element than<my-component>
, because there are two character differences (the two capitals), rather than just one (a hyphen).- If you use any non-Vue custom elements in your templates, such as a web component, PascalCase ensures that your Vue components remain distinctly visible.
Unfortunately, due to HTML's case insensitivity, DOM templates must still use kebab-case.
Also note that if you've already invested heavily in kebab-case, consistency with HTML conventions and being able to use the same casing across all your projects may be more important than the advantages listed above. In those cases, using kebab-case everywhere is also acceptable.
Bad
vue
<!-- In Single-File Components and string templates -->
<mycomponent/>
vue
<!-- In Single-File Components and string templates -->
<myComponent/>
vue
<!-- In DOM templates -->
<MyComponent></MyComponent>
Good
vue
<!-- In Single-File Components and string templates -->
<MyComponent/>
vue
<!-- In DOM templates -->
<my-component></my-component>
OR
vue
<!-- Everywhere -->
<my-component></my-component>
Component name casing in JS/JSX
Component names in JS/JSX should always be PascalCase, though they may be kebab-case inside strings for simpler applications that only use global component registration through app.component
.
Detailed Explanation
In JavaScript, PascalCase is the convention for classes and prototype constructors - essentially, anything that can have distinct instances. Vue components also have instances, so it makes sense to also use PascalCase. As an added benefit, using PascalCase within JSX (and templates) allows readers of the code to more easily distinguish between components and HTML elements.
However, for applications that use only global component definitions via app.component
, we recommend kebab-case instead. The reasons are:
- It's rare that global components are ever referenced in JavaScript, so following a convention for JavaScript makes less sense.
- These applications always include many in-DOM templates, where kebab-case must be used.
Bad
javascript
app.component('myComponent', {
// ...
})
javascript
import myComponent from './MyComponent.vue'
javascript
export default {
name: 'myComponent'
// ...
}
javascript
export default {
name: 'my-component'
// ...
}
Good
javascript
app.component('MyComponent', {
// ...
})
javascript
app.component('my-component', {
// ...
})
javascript
import MyComponent from './MyComponent.vue'
javascript
export default {
name: 'MyComponent'
// ...
}
Full-word component names
Component names should prefer full words over abbreviations.
The autocompletion in editors make the cost of writing longer names very low, while the clarity they provide is invaluable. Uncommon abbreviations, in particular, should always be avoided.
Bad
components/
|- SdSettings.vue
|- UProfOpts.vue
Good
components/
|- StudentDashboardSettings.vue
|- UserProfileOptions.vue
Prop name casing
Prop names should always use camelCase during declaration, but kebab-case in templates and JSX.
We're simply following the conventions of each language. Within JavaScript, camelCase is more natural. Within HTML, kebab-case is.
Bad
javascript
props: {
'greeting-text': String
}
vue
<WelcomeMessage greetingText="hi"/>
Good
javascript
props: {
greetingText: String
}
vue
<WelcomeMessage greeting-text="hi"/>
Multi-attribute elements
Elements with multiple attributes should span multiple lines, with one attribute per line.
In JavaScript, splitting objects with multiple properties over multiple lines is widely considered a good convention, because it's much easier to read. Our templates and JSX deserve the same consideration.
Bad
vue
<img src="https://vuejs.org/images/logo.png" alt="Vue Logo">
vue
<MyComponent foo="a" bar="b" baz="c"/>
Good
vue
<img
src="https://vuejs.org/images/logo.png"
alt="Vue Logo"
>
vue
<MyComponent
foo="a"
bar="b"
baz="c"
/>
Simple expressions in templates
Component templates should only include simple expressions, with more complex expressions refactored into computed properties or methods.
Complex expressions in your templates make them less declarative. We should strive to describe what should appear, not how we're computing that value. Computed properties and methods also allow the code to be reused.
Bad
vue
{{
fullName.split(' ').map((word) => {
return word[0].toUpperCase() + word.slice(1)
}).join(' ')
}}
Good
vue
<!-- In a template -->
{{ normalizedFullName }}
javascript
// The complex expression has been moved to a computed property
computed: {
normalizedFullName() {
return this.fullName.split(' ')
.map(word => word[0].toUpperCase() + word.slice(1))
.join(' ')
}
}
Simple computed properties
Complex computed properties should be split into as many simpler properties as possible.
Detailed Explanation
Simpler, well-named computed properties are:
Easier to test
When each computed property contains only a very simple expression, with very few dependencies, it's much easier to write tests confirming that it works correctly.
Easier to read
Simplifying computed properties forces you to give each value a descriptive name, even if it's not reused. This makes it much easier for other developers (and future you) to focus in on the code they care about and figure out what's going on.
More adaptable to changing requirements
Any value that can be named might be useful to the view. For example, we might decide to display a message telling the user how much money they saved. We might also decide to calculate sales tax, but perhaps display it separately, rather than as part of the final price.
Small, focused computed properties make fewer assumptions about how information will be used, so require less refactoring as requirements change.
Bad
javascript
computed: {
price() {
const basePrice = this.manufactureCost / (1 - this.profitMargin)
return (
basePrice -
basePrice * (this.discountPercent || 0)
)
}
}
Good
javascript
computed: {
basePrice() {
return this.manufactureCost / (1 - this.profitMargin)
},
discount() {
return this.basePrice * (this.discountPercent || 0)
},
finalPrice() {
return this.basePrice - this.discount
}
}
Quoted attribute values
Non-empty HTML attribute values should always be inside quotes (single or double, whichever is not used in JS).
While attribute values without any spaces are not required to have quotes in HTML, this practice often leads to avoiding spaces, making attribute values less readable.
Bad
vue
<input type=text>
vue
<AppSidebar :style={width:sidebarWidth+'px'}>
Good
vue
<input type="text">
vue
<AppSidebar :style="{ width: sidebarWidth + 'px' }">
Directive shorthands
Directive shorthands (:
for v-bind:
, @
for v-on:
and #
for v-slot
) should be used always or never.
Bad
vue
<input
v-bind:value="newTodoText"
:placeholder="newTodoInstructions"
>
vue
<input
v-on:input="onInput"
@focus="onFocus"
>
vue
<template v-slot:header>
<h1>Here might be a page title</h1>
</template>
<template #footer>
<p>Here's some contact info</p>
</template>
Good
vue
<input
:value="newTodoText"
:placeholder="newTodoInstructions"
>
vue
<input
v-bind:value="newTodoText"
v-bind:placeholder="newTodoInstructions"
>
vue
<input
@input="onInput"
@focus="onFocus"
>
vue
<input
v-on:input="onInput"
v-on:focus="onFocus"
>
vue
<template v-slot:header>
<h1>Here might be a page title</h1>
</template>
<template v-slot:footer>
<p>Here's some contact info</p>
</template>
vue
<template #header>
<h1>Here might be a page title</h1>
</template>
<template #footer>
<p>Here's some contact info</p>
</template>